|
An
analysis of multi-year performances
( January, 2002)
Being a
numbers guy by design and experience, I always like to sift
through the constant hype coming out of some of the largest,
Madison Avenue type rare coin dealerships and see what specific
series and types of coins have done from a price standpoint over
recent and past history. Now I can hear a cry go up from the
professional crowd as I use the Coin Dealer Newsletter (CDN)
dealer-to-dealer sight-seen bid prices as the basis for my
analyses. Some will say that these prices don't reflect true
wholesale levels for each series of coin in the marketplace today,
and others will say that the current owner of CDN is not as
conscientious as his father was at assuring accuracy of
data. Be this as it may or may not be, this is the best we
have for readily available data unless we choose to use retail
dealer-to-collector data from Coin World Trends, NumisMedia, or
pcgs.com for example, where the variations in pricing can be even
greater due to methodology and the myriad of mark-up levels
reflected in retail pricing. So just bear with me, unless
you can offer me a more consistent source of pricing data which,
after 5 years of research, I have yet to find. In fairness to
the data collectors, no two coins are alike even if they are the
same certified grade, series, year, and mintmark. A
weekly guide such as CDN will take the most common date of a
series, with the highest surviving populations across all grades,
to reflect prices for that particular series as a way to save
space. For instance, the pricing of the 1908 $5 Indian is
utilized for the $5 Indian Gold series since this specific rare coin has
the largest, most common, population of survivors for that series. More
detailed pricing information is published by CDN on a monthly and
rotating quarterly basis to take one down to the individual coin
levels by date and mintmark to cover the majority of U.S. coins across most
grades. Furthermore, one has to go beyond the series categories
themselves (say $5 Indian Gold) and analyze what specific
dates/mintmarks did to really understand which coins were winners and which
losers for a particular timeframe.
Although gold and silver bullion have done little, in net, to aid
U.S. rare coin prices over the last 5 years, my time horizon for
this analysis, recent physical purchasing of both precious metals
since 9-11 is about to turn this influence from negative to
positive. I have used the 12-Piece U.S. Gold Set as a
representative performance gauge for U.S. rare coins over multiple
decades, and I continue to feel that this generic gold set will
continue to be representative in the decades to come. Note
that we are talking about rather long periods of time here;
certainly, a half-decade or decade are much longer than most
investors' holdings periods in the 1990's stock market. Any
investor or collector has to have this long-time horizon for
plunking down hard-earned cash in numismatic coins. They are
not trading vehicles, especially since most individuals buy at
retail and obtain closer to wholesale prices when selling.
There are many variables at work in addition to a strong bullion
market, so it takes somewhat of an aligning of the planets to get
the U.S. rare coin market moving upward in a broad-based, full
participation Bull Market. The 12-Piece U.S. Gold Set has
had a bumpy ride of late, but remember that the prices shown are
for generic gold, that is, the most common, highest surviving
populations, by date/ mintmark issues of each series.
Remember also, that generic gold coins' fortunes are most closely
tied to bullion's performance than their more rare brethren, and
that gold was around $350 per ounce in January 1997 and currently
trades around $280 per ounce, a 20% decline. Without further
ado, a drum roll please:
|
|
|
|
Mint
State 65
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sight-Seen
CDN Bids
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-YEAR |
|
|
|
YTD 2001 |
|
CUMULATIVE |
|
12/21/01 |
|
+ / (-) |
|
RETURN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3,300 |
a
|
-5.7% |
$1 Type I |
-33.3% |
|
$30,750 |
b
|
-28.5% |
$1 Type II |
-15.8% |
|
$1,225 |
c
|
-9.3% |
$1 Type III |
-37.2% |
|
$1,060 |
d
|
11.6% |
$2 1/2 Liberty |
-41.1% |
|
$2,450 |
e
|
39.2% |
$2 1/2 Indian |
-17.2% |
|
$7,500 |
f
|
-9.1% |
$3 Indian Princess |
-27.2% |
|
$2,125 |
g
|
1.2% |
$5 Liberty w/ motto |
-46.9% |
|
$8,800 |
h
|
-2.2% |
$5 Indian |
-22.1% |
|
$42,500 |
i
|
0.0% |
$10
Liberty /no motto |
0.0% |
|
$2,350 |
j
|
16.0% |
$10 Liberty w/ motto |
-41.3% |
|
$2,350 |
k
|
6.8% |
$10 Indian |
-42.0% |
|
$7,500 |
l
|
-47.6% |
$20
Liberty Type I |
-75.0% |
|
$40,000 |
m
|
0.0% |
$20
Liberty Type II |
8.1% |
|
$1,875 |
n
|
4.2% |
$20 Liberty Type III |
-37.5% |
|
$840 |
o
|
15.1% |
$20 St. Gaudens |
-18.4% |
|
$23,250 |
p
|
-8.5% |
$20
High Relief |
25.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD '01 |
|
|
|
|
|
+ / (-) |
EIGHT PIECE
SET |
|
|
$21,850 |
|
6.2% |
U.S. GOLD |
-32.0% |
|
|
|
|
(d,e,g,h,j,k,n,o)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD '01 |
|
|
|
|
|
+ / (-) |
TWELVE PIECE
SET |
|
|
$64,625 |
|
-15.7% |
U.S. GOLD |
-24.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD '01 |
|
|
|
|
|
+ / (-) |
FOUR PIECE
SET |
|
|
$42,775 |
|
-23.8% |
U.S. GOLD |
-20.3% |
|
|
|
|
(a,b,c,f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only the burgundy colored series make up the 12, 8, and 4-Piece
U.S. gold sets; the gray colored series are noteworthy subsets of
the overall U.S. Gold category. As we can see from the
above, the 12-Piece U.S. Gold Set has pretty much tracked the
price of gold bullion during this 5-year period, down 24.7% versus
bullion's 20% decline. I don't recommend buying generic or
common date gold coins to attempt to benefit from a new bull
market in gold bullion, since pure bullion coins such as the
American Eagle and Canadian Maple Leaf can be had with premiums
over melt under 5% today. When you buy rare coins, buy truly
rare specimens that have combined PCGS and NGC populations under
70. So this means buying fewer coins of greater rarity; even circulated (but certified!) examples of pre-Civil War coins
are fine if they are also truly rare.
Back to the schedule above, looking at the YTD 2001 or Full-Year
2001 performances, the star performers were the $2.50 Indian
(heavily promoted by certain promo-driven dealers), up 39.2%, the
$10 Liberty with Motto, up 16.0%, and the $20 Saint Gaudens, up
15.1%. The hands-down loser, and we told you this would
happen in our "Coin Treasures and Hoards" articles, was
the $20 Liberty Type I, down 47.5%, that was minted during the rough seas
period from 1849 to 1866. Does anyone out there remember
the super-hyped Ship of Gold 1857-S $20 Liberty gold piece hoard that was
miraculously "curated' without touching one atom of original
patina?!! My how the prices of a series can dive when the
real population numbers surface from the murky seas of
history! Don't forget that the Brother Jonathan 1865-S hoard
of $20 Liberties (Double Eagles) would also be having a negative impact on Type I
pricing in 2001 as the population numbers eventually dribbled out
from PCGS and NGC. So, shiver me timbers, total existing supply
and even potential future supply still have a tremendous influence on
rare coin prices.
Another gold coin that had a down year in
2001, the $1 Gold, Type II, down 28.5%, is actually the rarest of
the entire 12-Piece U.S. Gold Set, so it is stretching things to
label it a generic gold coin. But with a wholesale sticker
price of $43,000 for MS65 "investment" or
"gem" grade in December, 2000, there were probably a few
Dot.com executives that had to make margin calls and put some
these diminutive beauties up for sale. This is still one of
my favorite long-term buys in U.S. gold since even the common date
of 1854 is rare in all uncirculated or Mint State grades.
However, with a CDN price of around $11,000 in Mint State 63 grade
today (recommended grade), an investor can sock away a truly rare
coin for under $14,000, with little potential for discovery of
future hoards. In comparison, this sum represents
three stock trades at the most, and you won't have to watch the
ticker tape or your EKG on a daily basis either. While they
can make more Cisco stock, they can't make any more $1 Gold, Type
II's, and the relatively low original mintage figures rule out the
possibility of price destroying hoards.
Switching metals, let's go over to the silver side of the aisle,
and observe what certain silver type coins have done on a
performance basis over the last 5 years. Let's look at a
subset of the Morgan Silver Dollar series that I have tagged the
High Priced Spread or HIPS grouping of Morgans in MS65 grade that
were over $3,500 in January, 1997. This sum represents over
time approximately 100 shares of the average stock listed on the
NYSE (pre-Crash). This selection process
was somewhat arbitrary, but the intent was to see if price denoted
rarity and market demand, and how this pricey group of silver
dollars would fare with time. Very, very well as you will
see for yourself:
|
|
|
|
Mint
State 65
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sight-Seen
CDN Bids
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-YEAR |
|
|
|
YTD 2001 |
|
CUM. |
|
12/21/01 |
|
+ / (-) |
MORGAN DOLLARS |
RETURN |
|
|
|
|
(HIPS
or High-Priced Spread) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$13,800 |
|
2.2% |
1879CC |
31.4% |
|
$5,800 |
|
0.0% |
1879 S
(REV. 78) |
56.8% |
|
$14,000 |
|
3.7% |
1880 O |
21.7% |
|
$22,000 |
|
0.0% |
1882 O/S |
18.9% |
|
$16,000 |
|
-23.8% |
1883 S |
0.0% |
|
$23,000 |
|
0.0% |
1887/6 O |
130.0% |
|
$4,150 |
|
0.0% |
1889 O |
29.7% |
|
$4,000 |
|
-20.0% |
1890 CC |
19.4% |
|
$6,000 |
|
-7.7% |
1891 P |
46.3% |
|
$6,750 |
|
28.6% |
1891 O |
60.7% |
|
$4,920 |
|
-3.5% |
1892 CC |
53.8% |
|
$4,750 |
|
-6.9% |
1892 O |
18.7% |
|
$5,600 |
|
-7.4% |
1893 |
51.4% |
|
$17,000 |
|
17.2% |
1894 P |
92.1% |
|
$5,000 |
|
7.5% |
1894S |
42.9% |
|
$13,250 |
|
-4.7% |
1895 S |
1.9% |
|
$11,500 |
|
-8.0% |
1896 S |
109.1% |
|
$37,500 |
|
-3.8% |
1897 O |
120.6% |
|
$5,750 |
|
-4.2% |
1903 S |
9.5% |
|
$4,800 |
|
0.0% |
1904 S |
17.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$225,570 |
|
-2.5% |
Totals
Shown |
47.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On a 5-Year basis, not a loser in the lot, with a subset
performance, even after a corrective year in 2001, of a whopping
47.3%. Selecting rare coins based solely on their prices
within the universe of a particular grade and series is not
without pitfalls, but this analysis shows that you get what you
pay for. This is also not to suggest that you rush out and
plunk over $37,000 for an 1897-O Morgan in MS65, but there are
plenty of purchase candidates within the
HIPS
list that are still
less than $7,000 today. Morgans have historically been one
of the most popular U.S. rare coin series within the silver dollar
type class, and that is unlikely to change in the future. Of
course, for anyone who is a regular subscriber to this ezine, my
favorite subset of Morgans is the Deep Mirror Prooflike variety
where the survival rates compared to regular business strikes are
1% to 2% maximum. These weighty, large, and often beautiful,
multi-toned examples of the art of minting are substantial numismatic pieces
that cover a broad and diverse historical period from 1878 to
1921. They are "Turn of the Century" relics that
came into being during a period of rapid change in America.
Each year and mintmark has a history lesson behind it.
Besides setting a price limit of $7,000 due to ease-of-liquidation
considerations if nothing else, study the coins above that have
appreciated less than 20% over the last 5 years. These
particular coins have less likelihood of experiencing additional
price corrections in 2002, and are probably poised for further
gains in the years ahead. This selection criteria would
include the 1890-CC, 1892-O, 1903-S, and 1904-S. I would
concentrate on these coins first since they have just begun to
move, but not pass up the prior
winners under $7,000 such as the 1879-S, 1889-O, 1892-CC, 1893,
and the 1894-S. The silver dollars in this latter subgroup have all had outsized gains in the last
5 years, but are still at least 40% below their 1989 all-time
highs. There is no guarantee that we will see the old highs
within the next decade, as there are no guarantees in life, but
U.S. rare coins have historically exceeded prior highs during
every bull market to date. The first subgroup acquisition approach would be to
buy the laggards, and the second subgroup approach would be to buy
the leaders. Kind of like bottom fishing and momentum
investing in stocks. As more and more stock investors get
disgusted with losses and diminished wealth since 2000, they will turn to
alternative investments such as U.S. rare coins. This has
been happening for the last year or so, especially in key and
semi-key date rare coins, where money has not seemed to be an
issue at auction. But I think even the big-money is buying
rarer coins, but fewer coins in total. Quality over
quantity.
I
will continue providing these types of analyses in the months
ahead (especially on DMPL's, Peace Dollars, and Seated Liberty
Half Dollars, three of my favorite silver type areas for 2002), because I think it is important to observe how the
market has been pricing certain series and individual issues of
U.S. rare coins. As I have said many times of late, some
U.S. rare coins have been in a true bull market over the last 5 years
and others are still waiting for their turn. I do think the
vast majority of U.S. rare coins are about to enter on a
multi-year bull market, if for no other reason than the total
capitalization of less than $4 Billion for the entire numismatic enchilada
is a drop in the bucket for U.S. investors. In fact, it
looks like less money than what has been lost in just one company
alone .......... E-N-R-O-N. Ya gotta know when to hold'em
and when to fold'em! Equally important, you have to know
where to find value on the investment landscape today. In
the last 5 years, certain numismatic pieces have become even more
undervalued and neglected by the majority.
|